ID :
351150
Sun, 12/14/2014 - 13:15
Auther :

Lower crude prices will even affect PG Arab economies badly: Oil exp

Tehran, Dec 14, IRNA - A lecturer in international political economy at Regent’s University London says that if oil prices fall further even the Persian Gulf Arab members of OPEC will face huge economic problems. Sara Bazoobandi made the statement in an interview with Sunday's edition of 'Tehran Times', adding: “For the OPEC economies, even the Arab Persian Gulf producers with large assets cushioned up in their sovereign wealth funds, the price at/or about $40 pb will have long-term negative macroeconomic consequences.” Ms. Bazoobandi, whose core research interest is focused on Iran and (Persian) Gulf Cooperation Council countries, said, “The balance of power struggle in the region between the two countries (Iran and Saudi Arabia) has not helped their much-required united decisions within OPEC.” Responding to a question on why OPEC couldn't reach an agreement, she said various considerations, mainly fear of losing market share to non-OPEC producers has contributed to the recent decision of OPEC. Given the current production quota system and historical backgrounds in OPEC, Saudi Arabia has been a key player in the organization and the recent decision was influenced by this role. In other words, Saudi Arabia and other the three Persian Gulf Arab producers, did not consider the short-term fiscal pressure on other OPEC members with high breakeven prices in this decision. From the latest meeting, it seems there is a cartel (formed of Arab Producers of the Persian Gulf) created within cartel (OPEC) and this will likely widen the gap within the organization and can make the future decisions harder to reach. On her opinion whether the decision will serve the interests of OPEC in the long run by discouraging investment in shale oil, Bazoobandi stated that the prices will certainly decrease further and stabilize at some point. When speaking about oil prices, it is important to differentiate between break-even prices, the prices that investors consider when deciding whether to invest in new producing capacities, and shut-in prices, the price that existing operators consider for covering variable costs and if those costs are not covered, they will stop production from existing wells. OPEC’s current decision is based on one assumption that lower break-even prices will reduce/slow down shale production. The U.S. shale break-even prices are estimated to be somewhere between $60 and $80 per barrel (pb). In reality however, what matters in the next few years for shale producers is the shut-in price, which falls below $40 pb. Therefore, existing shale production is likely to continue for sometimes even if prices stay low. For the OPEC economies, even the Arab Persian Gulf producers with large assets cushioned up in their sovereign wealth funds, the price at/or about $40 pb will have long-term negative macroeconomic consequences which will take them a long time to recover from. Regarding the daily's question whether the OPEC has weakend now, she said that the world is consuming roughly about 90 million barrel of oil per day. The OPEC is producing one third of this amount. Therefore, the OPEC produced oil is still quite important to the global energy markets. Moreover, the Persian Gulf oil is much cheaper to produce than most of the other regions in the world. So, the importance of OPEC for the global energy supply has not declined. However, one can argue that the political power of OPEC has decreased mainly due to the rise of non-OPEC production. Replying to a query whether the move, that Iran is seeking a price increase outside OPEC, can really work, she expressed doubt whether there would be much scope for price increase without production cut in the short-term. 'I also doubt any non-OPEC producer will make any significant production cut which will be sufficient to boost the prices unless it is a unified global strategy by, at least, the major producers. In the current oil market climate, production reduction of one producer means, another producer will fill the gap in the market, simply because there is surplus supply of over a million barrel per day in the market. I equally doubt Iran make any drastic decision to drop out of OPEC in the short-term, as it would not be useful for Iran in any respect. Iran outside of the OPEC will not hold more power to boost the prices single handedly.' On whether the conflict of interests between Iran-Saudi Arabia caused a failure by OPEC to reduce oil production, she said, oil has historically been a very politicized commodity; and Iran and Saudi Arabia have had their differences over oil policies within OPEC for the past decades. In addition, the balance of power struggle in the region between the two countries has not helped their much-required united decisions within OPEC. Saudi Arabia is the producer of one third of total OPEC productions; hence, it had traditionally held high decision-making power within the organization. The Saudi position with the GCC countries also encourages Saudi Arabia’s aspiration to take a leadership role within OPEC. As a result, Iran has often sought to lobby with non-GCC producers of OPEC to offset the Saudi influence. Having said that, it would be wrong to assume these two countries make all the decisions of OPEC or the difficulties and internal disputes within OPEC are only as a result of the conflict of interest between Iranians and Saudis. After all, oil is a highly political commodity and there are complex factors at the global level, which affect the markets.' On whether the extension of nuclear talks between Iran-5+1 group have any effect on the sanctions regime on Iran, she said: 'Iran’s oil production and export have significantly declined as a result of the toughened sanctions. In addition, the sanctions worsened Iran’s structural economic issues. 'Therefore, any extension of the negotiations and delay in lifting the sanctions will have continued negative impact on the Iranian economy. This combined with lower oil prices would only pose a bigger impact on Iran. The $700 million per month payments to Iran from its frozen assets (which is almost equal to selling of 300,000 barrel of oil a day at price of $70pb) will provide some assistance for the Iranian government’s liabilities. But such measures will surely not be sustainable.' On the issue of whether foreigners would be eager to invest in Iran’s oil and gas industries during this time, she said: 'The sanctions are probably by far a bigger threat to the future of foreign investment in Iran’s oil and gas sector. Lifting the sanctions will take long even if, and when, a deal is reached. From an investment perspective, given the low cost of production for Iranian oil, and increasing importance of gas as a strategic commodity both to Europe and Asia, Iran will be financially a desirable investment destination. However, there are other internal factors, which make it difficult for the foreign investors to enter Iran. The difficulty of doing business in Iran and the heavy government involvement in the economy, are amongst such factors.' /end

X