ID :
30174
Fri, 11/14/2008 - 10:03
Auther :
Shortlink :
https://www.oananews.org//node/30174
The shortlink copeid
(EDITORIAL from the JoongAng Daily on Nov. 14)
Constitutional discord
The Constitutional Court has ruled that levying the comprehensive real estate
taxes on a married-couple basis is unconstitutional and that levying the same tax
on homeowners whose primary purpose is to reside in their homes is in discord
with the Constitution.
When an act or a law is ruled ???in discord with the Constitution,??? the law
remains effective only temporarily in order to prevent confusion in society.
Technically it is the same as being unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court
explained that levying taxes on a married-couple basis discriminates against
married couples and is against the spirit of the Constitution to protect marriage
and the family.
The court also judged that blindly applying a progressive tax rate to those who
own homes for residential purposes, and therefore have less tax-paying capacity,
limits citizens??? property rights excessively.
We accept the Constitutional Court???s ruling as natural and reasonable. The
government and political circles must respect this decision and draw detailed
follow-up measures.
(END)
The Constitutional Court has ruled that levying the comprehensive real estate
taxes on a married-couple basis is unconstitutional and that levying the same tax
on homeowners whose primary purpose is to reside in their homes is in discord
with the Constitution.
When an act or a law is ruled ???in discord with the Constitution,??? the law
remains effective only temporarily in order to prevent confusion in society.
Technically it is the same as being unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court
explained that levying taxes on a married-couple basis discriminates against
married couples and is against the spirit of the Constitution to protect marriage
and the family.
The court also judged that blindly applying a progressive tax rate to those who
own homes for residential purposes, and therefore have less tax-paying capacity,
limits citizens??? property rights excessively.
We accept the Constitutional Court???s ruling as natural and reasonable. The
government and political circles must respect this decision and draw detailed
follow-up measures.
(END)